You have exactly 90 minutes to complete the quiz! After 90 minutes the quiz will automatically end.
Oops! You ran out of time :,(
RBT Mock Exam 13
This is a full-length practice exam designed to simulate the actual RBT Competency Assessment. Questions are mixed across all six domains, reflecting the real exam experience.
Exam Instructions
Before You Begin:
When Ready:
After Completion:
1 / 85
Tags: RBT, Mock Exam, Behavior Analysis
A. An RBT is implementing a behavior plan for a client whose problem behavior is maintained by MULTIPLE FUNCTIONS (attention, escape, AND tangible reinforcement). The intervention should:
Oops! Revisit the relevant guidelines.
Correct! Well done.
Explanation: Multi-function behavior requires multi-function intervention. Each function receives its own DRA component.
2 / 85
B. An RBT is collecting frequency data during a 45-minute session. The target behavior occurs 9 times. Rate per minute is:
Explanation: 9/45 = 0.2/min = 12/hour (all mathematically equivalent).
3 / 85
C. An RBT is implementing a PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT and observes the client ALWAYS selecting items from the LEFT POSITION regardless of item. The RBT should:
Explanation: Consistent position selection = position bias. Rotate locations to identify true item preferences.
4 / 85
D. An RBT is implementing a teaching procedure and notices the client achieves 100% accuracy WITH full physical prompting but only 5% WITHOUT prompts. This 95-point gap indicates:
Explanation: Extreme gap = severe dependency. Very gradual fading (light touch → model → gestural → verbal) is essential.
5 / 85
E. An RBT observes that a client’s behavior occurs ONLY when a SPECIFIC STAFF MEMBER is absent and DECREASES when that staff member is present. This pattern suggests:
Explanation: Person-specific pattern indicates stimulus control. That person’s presence affects behavior through structure, support, or other antecedent factors.
6 / 85
F. An RBT is implementing a DISCRETE TRIAL TEACHING session. The proper sequence is:
Explanation: Proper DTT: (1) Antecedent/Instruction, (2) wait time (~3 sec), (3) Response, (4) Consequence, (5) ITI.
7 / 85
G. An RBT is implementing a behavior plan for ATTENTION-MAINTAINED aggression. A functional DRA alternative is:
Explanation: DRA must serve the same function. If aggression produces attention, appropriate alternative should too.
8 / 85
H. An RBT is using a BEHAVIORAL MOMENTUM (high-p) sequence. This procedure involves:
Explanation: High-p builds compliance momentum through initial “yes” responses before difficult request.
9 / 85
I. An RBT is monitoring a client’s learning data across trial blocks: Trials 1-10: 35% accuracy Trials 11-20: 50% accuracy Trials 21-30: 68% accuracy Trials 31-40: 79% accuracy This pattern indicates:
Explanation: Consistent accuracy increase across trial blocks demonstrates learning is occurring. Continue current approach.
10 / 85
J. An RBT is implementing a plan where a client has learned to request “break” appropriately instead of escaping through elopement. After success, break requests increase dramatically (every 2 minutes). The RBT’s interpretation should be:
Explanation: High requests = successful learning. Adjust parameters for balance. Option A misinterprets success.
11 / 85
K. An RBT is implementing ERRORLESS LEARNING with a client who has intellectual disability. The procedure emphasizes:
Explanation: Errorless learning = prevent errors via immediate prompts, then fade. Reduces frustration and builds confidence.
12 / 85
L. An RBT documents: “Client was uncooperative and difficult.” A more OBJECTIVE version is:
Explanation: Option C provides specific, measurable data (refusal %, off-task periods).
13 / 85
M. An RBT is implementing a multi-component behavior plan. Week 1: improvement. Weeks 2-3: plateau (no further change). The RBT’s best action is:
Explanation: Plateau warrants investigation. Supervisor consultation helps determine whether modification is needed.
14 / 85
N. An RBT is implementing a teaching procedure using LEAST-TO-MOST PROMPTING. The client responds incorrectly WITHOUT prompts. The next step should be:
Explanation: Least-to-most: start minimal; add intrusive only if needed. Progress systematically through hierarchy.
15 / 85
O. An RBT is measuring a client’s compliance during 10 task demands: Complied: 8 Non-complied: 2 Compliance percentage is:
Explanation: Compliance = (Complied ÷ Total) × 100 = (8 ÷ 10) × 100 = 80%.
16 / 85
P. An RBT is implementing a plan with EXTINCTION for attention-maintained behavior. In week 2, the target behavior INCREASES and becomes more intense. The RBT should:
Explanation: Extinction burst is expected during extinction. Persist through it; giving in reinforces the intensity increase.
17 / 85
Q. An RBT is implementing a behavior plan. Implementation fidelity has DECLINED over 5 weeks (95% → 90% → 85% → 80% → 75%). This pattern is:
Explanation: Consistent decline = drift pattern. This signals need for retraining and support to restore fidelity.
18 / 85
R. An RBT is using BACKWARD CHAINING for a client learning a 7-step task. In session 1, the client should perform:
Explanation: Backward chaining = teach last step first. This allows immediate task completion (natural reinforcement).
19 / 85
S. An RBT is collecting PARTIAL INTERVAL RECORDING data. If the target behavior occurs at ANY point during the interval, the RBT marks:
Explanation: Partial interval = mark “YES” if behavior occurs at ANY time. Lenient; overestimates actual duration.
20 / 85
T. An RBT is implementing a TASK ANALYSIS-based teaching procedure. The FIRST step in task analysis development is:
Explanation: Task analysis begins by breaking the skill into teachable components. Only then can baseline, method, etc. follow.
21 / 85
U. An RBT is implementing a FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING (FCT) plan. For FCT to remain effective, what is CRITICAL?
Explanation: FCT only works if the taught communication continues producing its function. Otherwise, client reverts to problem behavior.
22 / 85
V. An RBT observes a behavioral ESCALATION SEQUENCE: request denied → whining → escalating tone → screaming → object thrown. Understanding this chain, the RBT can intervene MOST EFFECTIVELY:
Explanation: Early intervention prevents escalation to severe behaviors. Most effective point in the chain.
23 / 85
W. An RBT is collecting IOA (Inter-Observer Agreement) data: Observer A records: 20 instances Observer B records: 25 instances IOA is:
Explanation: IOA = (Smaller ÷ Larger) × 100 = (20 ÷ 25) × 100 = 80%.
24 / 85
X. An RBT is implementing a behavior plan. After 4 weeks with 95% implementation fidelity, the client shows NO PROGRESS. This suggests:
Explanation: High fidelity but no progress = plan effectiveness is questioned. Reassessment and modification may be needed.
25 / 85
Y. An RBT is implementing NATURALISTIC TEACHING. A client shows interest in a toy by reaching and vocalizing. The RBT’s best response is:
Explanation: NET uses natural motivation as a teaching opportunity for functional communication with natural reinforcement.
26 / 85
Z. An RBT is monitoring a client’s behavior data: Week 1: 25 instances per day Week 2: 23 instances per day Week 3: 20 instances per day Week 4: 18 instances per day This pattern indicates:
Explanation: Consistent downward trend (25 → 18) indicates intervention effectiveness.
27 / 85
AA. An RBT is implementing a SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT. The plan gradually reduces reinforcement frequency from FR1 (every response) to FR8 (every 8 responses). This process is called:
Explanation: Gradually reducing reinforcement frequency = thinning. Builds independence from frequent rewards.
28 / 85
AB. An RBT is implementing MOST-TO-LEAST PROMPTING. The client currently achieves 92% accuracy with gestural prompts. The appropriate next step is:
Explanation: At mastery (92%), fade to less intrusive level. Options A, C, D are inappropriate.
29 / 85
AC. An RBT is collecting DURATION DAT
Explanation: 4:45 + 3:20 = 8:05 (8 minutes, 5 seconds).
30 / 85
AD. An RBT is implementing a MULTI-COMPONENT BEHAVIOR PLAN (antecedent modifications + DRA + extinction). After 2 weeks, data show improvement but week-to-week variability. Before changing the plan, the RBT should:
Explanation: Variability warrants investigation. BCBA collaboration helps troubleshoot causes.
31 / 85
AE. An RBT is documenting a behavior incident. The entry should include:
Explanation: Professional documentation includes complete context: antecedent, specific behaviors, staff response, duration, outcome.
32 / 85
AF. An RBT is implementing a teaching procedure for a client showing generalization deficits (learns in training but not in other contexts). Intervention should include:
Explanation: Generalization training = vary people, settings, materials systematically to promote transfer.
33 / 85
AG. An RBT is monitoring a client’s accuracy progression: Day 1-3: 40% accuracy Day 4-6: 55% accuracy Day 7-9: 70% accuracy Day 10-12: 82% accuracy This indicates:
Explanation: Increasing accuracy across day-blocks demonstrates learning is occurring.
34 / 85
AH. An RBT is implementing DRO (Differential Reinforcement of Other behavior). The plan states: “Reinforce if self-injury does NOT occur for 8 minutes.” The RBT should:
Explanation: DRO = reinforce after specified time period with NO occurrence of target behavior.
35 / 85
AI. An RBT is implementing FORWARD CHAINING for a 6-step task. After step 1 is mastered, the RBT should:
Explanation: Forward chaining = teach steps in order FROM FIRST. After mastery, add next step.
36 / 85
AJ. An RBT observes that a client’s on-task behavior is 88% during 1-on-1 instruction but only 25% during independent work. This pattern suggests:
Explanation: Performance dependent on RBT presence = person-specific stimulus control. Generalization training needed.
37 / 85
AK. An RBT is implementing a behavior plan and notices INCREASING COMPLIANCE TREND over 6 weeks (60% → 70% → 75% → 82% → 85% → 88%). The RBT should:
Explanation: Strong upward trend indicates effectiveness. Continue while planning sustainability and next steps.
38 / 85
AL. An RBT is collecting MOMENTARY TIME SAMPLING data. Observations at random 5-minute intervals (8 observations total during 40-minute session) show behavior present in 5 observations. Report as:
Explanation: Momentary time sampling reports proportion of observations where behavior was present (5/8 ≈ 62.5%).
39 / 85
AM. An RBT is implementing SHAPING for accuracy. Client currently at 51% accuracy. To properly shape:
Explanation: Shaping = reinforce incremental progress. Building 51% → 53% → 56% celebrates small improvements.
40 / 85
AN. An RBT is implementing a plan for a client’s behavior maintained by INTERNAL SENSORY CONSEQUENCES (automatic reinforcement). Intervention might include:
Explanation: Automatic/sensory behavior requires addressing the underlying sensory need functionally through enrichment and alternatives.
41 / 85
AO. An RBT is monitoring implementation fidelity and observes: High fidelity (92%) → Client improvement. Low fidelity (65%) → Less client improvement. This illustrates:
Explanation: Fidelity → Treatment Effectiveness → Client Outcomes. Clear relationship.
42 / 85
AP. An RBT observes that a client’s problem behavior occurs ONLY DURING TRANSITIONS and is minimal during structured activities. This pattern suggests:
Explanation: Context-specific pattern indicates antecedent control. Transition-specific modifications (warnings, visuals, prep) are appropriate.
43 / 85
AQ. An RBT is implementing DRI (Differential Reinforcement of Incompatible behavior) for a client’s hitting. An incompatible behavior is:
Explanation: DRI requires behavior physically impossible to occur simultaneously with problem behavior.
44 / 85
AR. An RBT is implementing a teaching procedure and measures ACCURACY across 35 trials: Correct: 28 Incorrect: 5 No response: 2 Accuracy percentage is:
Explanation: Accuracy = (Correct ÷ Total) × 100 = (28 ÷ 35) × 100 = 80%.
45 / 85
AS. An RBT is implementing a plan for a client whose behavior is maintained by MULTIPLE FUNCTIONS (attention AND tangible). Intervention components should:
Explanation: Multi-function = multi-intervention. Each function gets its own targeted DRA.
46 / 85
AT. An RBT is monitoring client behavior using WHOLE INTERVAL RECORDING. For 10 intervals of 1 minute each, the behavior occurs continuously in only 3 intervals. This should be reported as:
Explanation: Whole interval = mark “YES” only if entire interval. Conservative; underestimates actual duration.
47 / 85
AU. An RBT is implementing a behavior plan. Data show: Week 1: Improvement Week 2: Improvement Week 3: Plateau Week 4: Slight improvement Before declaring the plan ineffective, the RBT should:
Explanation: Plateau warrants investigation. Don’t assume failure; troubleshoot.
48 / 85
AV. An RBT is implementing NATURALISTIC TEACHING. A client reaches for a preferred snack. The RBT should:
Explanation: NET = natural motivation → teaching opportunity for functional communication → natural reinforcement.
49 / 85
AW. An RBT is collecting RATE DATA across different time periods: Session 1 (30 min): 6 instances → 0.2/min Session 2 (45 min): 9 instances → 0.2/min Session 3 (60 min): 12 instances → 0.2/min This consistency in RATE suggests:
Explanation: Consistent rate (0.2/min across sessions) indicates stable frequency regardless of session length.
50 / 85
AX. An RBT is implementing a plan for ESCAPE-MAINTAINED aggression. An appropriate intervention includes:
Explanation: Escape-maintained → modify trigger + teach alternatives + build capacity.
51 / 85
AY. An RBT observes implementation fidelity DECLINING (95% → 90% → 85%). This pattern is:
Explanation: Consistent decline = drift. Report for retraining and support.
52 / 85
AZ. An RBT is implementing a HIGH-PROBABILITY (high-p) REQUEST SEQUENCE for compliance training. The procedure involves:
Explanation: High-p builds momentum. Easy “yes” responses increase compliance probability with hard request.
53 / 85
BA. An RBT is monitoring a client’s learning progression using accuracy: Block 1 (trials 1-10): 32% Block 2 (trials 11-20): 47% Block 3 (trials 21-30): 61% Block 4 (trials 31-40): 75% This indicates:
Explanation: Increasing accuracy across trial blocks = learning.
54 / 85
BB. An RBT is implementing a DISCRETE TRIAL. The client responds incorrectly. The appropriate RBT response is:
Explanation: Incorrect response → corrective feedback (model correct) → no reinforcement → re-present trial.
55 / 85
BC. An RBT is measuring client behavior and calculates IOA (Inter-Observer Agreement): Observer A: 18 instances Observer B: 22 instances IOA is:
Explanation: IOA = (Smaller ÷ Larger) × 100 = (18 ÷ 22) × 100 ≈ 82%.
56 / 85
BD. An RBT is implementing a behavior plan with HIGH FIDELITY (95%). After 5 weeks, client shows MINIMAL PROGRESS. This suggests:
Explanation: High fidelity but minimal progress = plan needs reassessment or modification.
57 / 85
BE. An RBT is implementing a plan where a client learns to request “break” appropriately for escape. After learning, breaks are requested frequently. The RBT’s interpretation should be:
Explanation: High requests = successful learning. Adjust parameters for balance.
58 / 85
BF. An RBT is implementing a teaching procedure. The client shows: Trial 1-5: 45% accuracy Trial 6-10: 58% accuracy Trial 11-15: 70% accuracy This indicates:
Explanation: Increasing accuracy = learning is occurring.
59 / 85
BG. An RBT is documenting: “Client was well-behaved today.” Better documentation:
Explanation: Option C provides specific, measurable data.
60 / 85
BH. An RBT is implementing a plan for a client with PROMPT DEPENDENCY: Accuracy WITH prompts: 96% Accuracy WITHOUT prompts: 15% This 81-point gap indicates:
Explanation: Extreme gap = severe dependency. Gradual fading through intermediate steps essential.
61 / 85
BI. An RBT is monitoring whether a client’s behavior is CHANGING MEANINGFULLY over time: Week 1: 28 instances Week 2: 27 instances Week 3: 26 instances Week 4: 25 instances This pattern indicates:
Explanation: Consistent decline (28 → 25) indicates meaningful downward trend.
62 / 85
BJ. An RBT is implementing a MULTI-COMPONENT plan. Data show variability. The RBT’s response should be:
Explanation: Variability warrants investigation before changes.
63 / 85
BK. An RBT is using LEAST-TO-MOST PROMPTING for a client with low baseline skills. The hierarchy from least to most intrusive is:
Explanation: Least-to-most starts minimal and progressively adds more intrusive prompts.
64 / 85
BL. An RBT is implementing a BACKWARD CHAINING procedure for a 5-step cooking task. After step 5 is mastered, the RBT should:
Explanation: Backward chaining = work backward. After final step mastered, add penultimate step.
65 / 85
BM. An RBT observes that when the BCBA provides IMMEDIATE, SPECIFIC feedback, the RBT’s fidelity is 96%. When feedback is DELAYED or VAGUE, fidelity drops to 68%. This illustrates:
Explanation: Supervisor feedback reinforces RBT behavior. Clear interlocking contingency.
66 / 85
BN. An RBT is implementing DRA for ATTENTION-MAINTAINED behavior. The alternative must:
Explanation: DRA effectiveness = alternative serves same function.
67 / 85
BO. An RBT is collecting FREQUENCY DAT
Explanation: Frequency = count all instances = 38 + 8 + 4 = 50 total.
68 / 85
BP. An RBT is implementing a teaching procedure where the client practices a skill 25 times in one session. This:
Explanation: Multiple practice repetitions = building fluency.
69 / 85
BQ. An RBT is implementing a behavior plan for a client with GENERALIZATION DEFICITS. Intervention should:
Explanation: Generalization = teach systematically across contexts.
70 / 85
BR. An RBT is monitoring compliance data: Day 1: 75% Day 2: 78% Day 3: 74% Day 4: 76% This pattern indicates:
Explanation: Data hover around baseline with no systematic trend. Stable performance.
71 / 85
BS. An RBT is implementing TOTAL TASK CHAINING for a client learning to dress (4 steps). Each session, the client should:
Explanation: Total task = all steps each trial/session, with graduated support.
72 / 85
BT. An RBT observes that a client’s behavior ESCALATES (screaming → aggression → property destruction). Understanding this chain, the RBT should intervene:
Explanation: Early intervention prevents escalation to severe phases.
73 / 85
BU. An RBT is implementing a behavior plan with 98% fidelity. Client shows SLOW BUT CONSISTENT IMPROVEMENT. The RBT should:
Explanation: Consistent improvement = plan effectiveness. Continue monitoring.
74 / 85
BV. An RBT is measuring ACCURACY out of 40 trials: Correct: 32 Incorrect: 5 No response: 3 Accuracy percentage is:
Explanation: Accuracy = (Correct ÷ Total) × 100 = (32 ÷ 40) × 100 = 80%.
75 / 85
BW. An RBT is told to implement a procedure but feels UNSURE about details. The appropriate response is:
Explanation: RBTs work within competence. Request training before implementation.
76 / 85
BX. An RBT is implementing a plan showing CLEAR DOWNWARD TREND over 6 weeks. The RBT’s appropriate action is:
Explanation: Positive trend warrants continuation and planning next steps.
77 / 85
BY. An RBT observes that implementation fidelity has IMPROVED from 75% to 92% over 6 weeks. This improvement most likely reflects:
Explanation: Improving fidelity = RBT skill development through practice.
78 / 85
BZ. An RBT is implementing a plan with DR
Explanation: High frequency of successful alternative = functional success. Adjust parameters for balance.
79 / 85
CA. An RBT is implementing ERRORLESS LEARNING. After the client achieves mastery with full physical prompts, the next step is:
Explanation: After mastery with full prompts, fade systematically to less intrusive levels.
80 / 85
CB. An RBT is monitoring implementation fidelity and data show it is HIGHLY VARIABLE (87% one week, 65% the next, 78% the next). This suggests:
Explanation: High variability in fidelity = inconsistent implementation. Address barriers to consistency.
81 / 85
CC. An RBT is implementing a behavior plan. Baseline shows 30 instances daily. After 8 weeks: Weeks 1-2: 28 instances/day Weeks 3-4: 24 instances/day Weeks 5-6: 18 instances/day Weeks 7-8: 15 instances/day This trend indicates:
Explanation: Consistent decline (30 → 15) demonstrates strong intervention effectiveness.
82 / 85
CD. An RBT documents an incident. The CORRECT method for correcting documentation errors is:
Explanation: Professional correction preserves document integrity while showing intentional correction.
83 / 85
CE. An RBT is implementing a PREFERENCE ASSESSMENT using paired-choice format. This involves:
Explanation: Paired-choice = two items per trial, repeated through all combinations.
84 / 85
CF. An RBT is implementing a behavior plan showing good progress. To ensure SUSTAINABILITY and prevent regression, the RBT should:
Explanation: Maintain implementation while planning long-term sustainability and next steps.
85 / 85
CG. Before the official RBT exam, the candidate’s BEST preparation is:
Explanation: Effective prep = deep understanding, practice with feedback, targeted review, self-care.
Your score is
The average score is 0%
Your cart is currently empty!
Notifications